[Chapter-delegates] [FYI] ISOC position on the ICANN Joint Project Agreement

[Franck Martin]

Bill,

To make it an ISOC position, it needs to be endorsed by all of ISOC.
This includes Chapters, Organization members and individuals.

Thanks you for providing us a draft that we can discuss and have input with.

Cheers

Bill Graham wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>  
> In advance of the ICANN meeting in Delhi next week, I would like to
> share with you an overview of the comments ISOC is planning to submit
> to the United States Department of Commerce Notice of Inquiry on the
> mid-term review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) between DoC and
> ICANN.    This position is based on ISOC principles and builds on past
> submissions.  We continue to support a transition to a private sector
> model for administration of the domain name system, and we continue to
> be supportive of ICANN’s efforts as they evolve to this model.
>  
> When the JPA was created in September 2006 it had two parts:
>
> ·      the agreement itself and
>
> ·      an annex written by the ICANN Board. 
>
>  

-- 
Franck Martin
ICT Specialist
franck at sopac.org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9  D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20080208/96dfcba0/attachment.htm>