[chapter-delegates] Patent on IPv6

[Veni Markovski]

Franck,
ISOC can not take a position, where the issue concerns one of its org 
members. Whether it was a registered NGO or not, that would not change the 
situation.

And be aware, as chapters are also not supposed to make statements which 
may be considered as not proper, if they are aimed against any of the ISOC 
org members.

I have experienced this last year, when Microsoft approached ISOC in Reston 
to ask them how dare we sue them in Bulgaria at the Fair Trade Commission. 
Actually, under our laws, this is not a case, but a signal, which I sent - 
together with two members of the Parliament.

It's not easy to work in your own country, if the HQ have broader spectrum 
of interests than your chapter:)

veni

At 12:37 24-03-05  +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
>http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,2533,a=148304,00.asp
>
>I think the above story illustrate why ISOC should be a registered NGO 
>with the WTO and WIPO.
>
>Cheers
>
>--
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Franck Martin
>franck at sopac.org
>"Toute connaissance est une rИponse Ю une question"
>G. Bachelard
>
>
>