[chapter-delegates] How we can improve the chapter <-> BoT relations

[Veni Markovski]

Thank you, Ramon.

You've read and understood my thoughts correctly.
I believe the best we can do today - and I can't find excuse not to do it - 
is to define the right processes. We'll need that with regards to the 
chapter funding program, too.

I can't find a reason why would someone opose such a move, which is aiming 
at ensuring better communcations between ISOC and its members - be it 
individual, chapters or organizational.

What Fred wrote, I think, was because probably my idea was written with my 
"chapter hat". Think that today things seem clearer?

best,
veni

At 03:21 17-03-05  -0400, Ramon Morales wrote:
>Fred,
>In the absence of a vehicle for ISOC wide consultation mechanisms, what Veni
>Markovski is suggesting is not a call for a federation of chapters but a
>sound manner for the ISOC Board to devise a methodology for consultation of
>its most active organized segment that has the capacity to mobilize ISOC
>members through its local presence (our chapters). Why would we want to
>render this unsound by invoking others who may be similarly left out of the
>loop through an ISOC BoT who in its recent actions or lack thereof appears
>to be out of touch with the reality of its members and its chapters?