[MemberPubPol] [chapter-delegates] FYI - in the coming discussion of the WGIG questionnaire

[Veni Markovski]

At 07:52 20-06-05  -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
>I tend to try to stay on topic, answering emails on a given topic with a 
>response that is on the topic. I don't know how to have a rational 
>discussion otherwise.

Well, could you define then the term "access" as used in your previous mail?
I can't comment or respond on your following sentence, which is the key one 
for explaining all:

>>At 06:53 20-06-05  -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
>>>I understand the question generally. Specifically, who would you like to 
>>>see included in the ICANN process that has no access today?
>>
>>To use your words, define "access".
>>
>>veni


As for your other remarks, since you see more topics coming... Continuing 
to avoid them will not solve them by a magic. We all need to address the 
problems that ISOC, ICANN and the Internet community are facing, if we want 
to solve them. ISOC tends to try to be neutral, which does not help a lot 
in the current debate on Internet Governance.

best,
veni