[chapter-delegates] FYI - in the coming discussion of the WGIG questionnaire

[TeddyAP]

At 02:18 PM 6/7/2005, Fred Baker wrote:
>On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:44 PM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>>assuming that the ITU would be unable to manage a root server is 
>>ingenerous to them
>
>perhaps. But they are not asking to manage a root server. They are asking 
>to control the contents of all of them.
>
>And look at the one they do control, the enum root. In that server, Taiwan 
>can't get access to its own country code (886) because Red China vetoes 
>it. Regardless of your position on the Taiwan Straits issue, it 
>demonstrates that the ITU can't manage a server in a manner that serves 
>all affected parties well.

Correct.
I think, we have to look back, Why there was a MoU between IAB and ITU?
ITU mandated e.64 root to ARIN; ARIN is one of the RIR;  Why not IAB
mandate it to ARIN?. Are there the answers?.

Brgds,
-teddy