[chapter-delegates] Re: I object to the 2005 ISOC Nominations Committee process (was Report of the 2005 ISOC Nominations)

[Gene Gaines]

Margaret,

(I'll not repeat your message here, the subject is sufficient.)

Veni and others have asked us to stop this discussion,
and I will, but think your email to me deserves a reply.

Thank you for a thoughtful, well-reasoned response. I respect
and accept your reasoning.

There are substantial misunderstandings -- call them ghosts if
you will -- concerning ISOC and its chapters. We are putting
them on the table and dealing with them, so we can move beyond
and many people in many countries can feel comfortable working
together.

I want the issues raised. I do not mind for others to say I am
wrong.

I go silent now.

Gene
gene.gaines at gainesgroup.com

On Thursday, April 7, 2005, 12:50:07 PM, Margaret wrote:

> Hi Gene,

> At 10:49 AM -0400 4/7/05, Gene Gaines wrote:
>>How can nominations that did not specify whether they wished to
>>serve as a representative of (a) Chapters or (b) Organizational
>>Members possibly be considered as complete nominations?

> I am sorry, but my wording was not accurate...  These nominations did
> not fail to specify an election, they actually specified the the
> candidate was nominated for both elections.  This was explicitly
> allowed by our Call for Nominations, which said:

--- snip ---