<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Dear Victor,<br>
    <br>
    following up on my email below, I had a look at the "Procedures for
    Selecting Trustees" on
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.internetsociety.org/about-internet-society/governance-policies/procedures-selecting-trustees/">https://www.internetsociety.org/about-internet-society/governance-policies/procedures-selecting-trustees/</a><br>
    <br>
    I was flabbergasted about a number of the points in the process. I
    already expressed by concern in relation to the strange publication
    of results and I guess there must be some obscure historical reasons
    why it was designed this way, but the other thing that got me to
    have difficulty staying in my seat was the "Challenges" section:<br>
    <i><br>
      <font color="#0000ff">Any challenge must be addressed to the
        President of the Society with a recital of the reasons for the
        challenge, and must be received no later than 7 days following
        the end of the election. The President, after consultation with
        the Chairs of the Nominations and Elections Committees and the
        members of the Board of Trustees, shall advise the author of the
        challenge of the Board’s decision, which shall be final, within
        7 days following the end of the challenge period.</font></i><br>
    <br>
    Well that's a pretty terrible idea.<br>
    <br>
    In organizations with elected board members, it is <strong>not
      typical</strong> for the <strong>President and CEO</strong> to
    directly resolve election issues. Let’s explore why:
    <div class="content" tabindex="0" aria-description=""
aria-label="Sent by Copilot: In organizations with elected board members, it is **not typical** for the **President and CEO** to directly resolve election issues. Let's explore why:

1. **Roles and Responsibilities**:
   - The **President and CEO** typically focus on strategic leadership, organizational management, and overall decision-making.
   - **Election issues** fall within the purview of the **board** and its governance processes.

2. **Board Independence**:
   - **Board members** are elected by shareholders or stakeholders to represent their interests.
   - To maintain independence and avoid conflicts of interest, the **CEO** should not directly intervene in election matters.

3. **Board Governance**:
   - **Election issues** are handled by the **Nominating and Governance Committee** or a similar board committee.
   - These committees oversee board nominations, elections, and related processes.

4. **Transparency and Fairness**:
   - **Election processes** must be transparent, fair, and free from undue influence.
   - Involvement of the **CEO** could raise concerns about bias or favoritism.

5. **Legal and Regulatory Compliance**:
   - Organizations must adhere to legal and regulatory requirements regarding board elections.
   - The **CEO** should not interfere with these processes to ensure compliance.

In summary, while the **CEO** plays a crucial role in organizational leadership, election issues are best handled by the **board** and its designated committees to maintain transparency and impartiality. 🗳️👥">
      <div class="ac-container ac-adaptiveCard" style="">
        <div class="ac-textBlock" style="">
          <ol>
            <li>
              <p><strong>Roles and Responsibilities</strong>:</p>
              <ul>
                <li>The <strong>President and CEO</strong> typically
                  focus on strategic leadership, organizational
                  management, and overall decision-making.</li>
                <li><strong>Election issues</strong> fall within the
                  purview of the <strong>board</strong> and its
                  governance processes.</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p><strong>Board Independence</strong>:</p>
              <ul>
                <li><strong>Board members</strong> are elected by
                  stakeholders to represent their interests.</li>
                <li>To maintain independence and avoid conflicts of
                  interest, the <strong>CEO</strong> should not
                  directly intervene in election matters.</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p><strong>Board Governance</strong>:</p>
              <ul>
                <li><strong>Election issues</strong> are handled by the
                  <strong>Nominations Committee.</strong><br>
                </li>
                <li>This committee oversees board nominations,
                  elections, and related processes so why is it not also
                  in charge of <b>challenges</b>?.</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p><strong>Transparency and Fairness</strong>:</p>
              <ul>
                <li><strong>Election processes</strong> must be
                  transparent, fair, and free from undue influence.</li>
                <li>Involvement of the <strong>CEO</strong> could raise
                  concerns about bias or favouritism.</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
            <li>
              <p><strong>Legal and Regulatory Compliance</strong>:</p>
              <ul>
                <li>Organizations must adhere to legal and regulatory
                  requirements regarding board elections.</li>
                <li>The <strong>CEO</strong> should not interfere with
                  these processes to ensure compliance.</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
          </ol>
          <p>In summary, while the <strong>CEO</strong> plays a crucial
            role in organizational leadership, election issues are best
            handled by the <strong>board</strong> and its designated
            committees to maintain transparency and impartiality. <br>
          </p>
          <p>Let's remember that the Board is the CEO's boss so isn't it
            plain obvious that the CEO should not be able to make
            decisions pertaining to selection of his/her boss? (*)<br>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div class="ac-horizontal-separator" aria-hidden="true" style=""></div>
      </div>
      <div class="ad-container"> </div>
    </div>
    <style>table {
            border: 1px solid #c4c7c5;
            border-radius: 4px;
            font-size: 16px;
          }th {
            padding: 18px 16px;
            text-align: left;
          }td {
            padding: 16px;
            border-top: 1px solid #c4c7c5;
          }button.js-code-copy {
            display: none;
          }.katex-mathml{
            display: block;
            text-align: center;
          }.katex-html {
            display: none;
          }</style>I am copying Ms. Ilona Levine, ISOC General Counsel,
    as her extensive experience on Compliance would definitely be of
    value to this conversation.<br>
    <br>
    Kindest regards,<br>
    <br>
    Olivier Crépin-Leblond, PhD<br>
    <br>
    (*) passing no judgement on the current President and CEO Andrew
    Sullivan, this is a wider matter of standard Board governance<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/04/2024 21:34, Olivier MJ
      Crépin-Leblond via Chapter-delegates wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:94b3a72a-a7e8-4555-9049-5351e71f8709@gih.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Dear Victor,<br>
      <br>
      thanks for your explanation. With abstentions the vote number
      makes sense.<br>
      And thanks for explaining the language in the Procedures for
      Trustees. <br>
      Kindest regards,<br>
      <br>
      Olivier<br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/04/2024 20:56, Victor Kuarsingh
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJc3aaM8orPMOQDXGp_n=DOGgZUcGOt7Wa+mLUFoiOGHUsf9=w@mail.gmail.com">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type"
          content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr">Olivier,
            <div><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">The
                  language in the Procedures for Trustees, Publication
                  of the Result, says:</span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><br>
                </span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.666667px"><b>"Publication
                    of the Result</b></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.666667px"><b>Only
                    the vote counts of the elected candidate Trustee and
                    the total vote count are to be published, while all
                    candidates and the Board of Trustees will be
                    provided with the full list of candidates and the
                    number of votes that each received."</b></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">Basically,
                  only the vote count of those elected and the total
                  vote count get released broadly (full details are
                  distributed to the candidates and board).  I can
                  confirm that there were abstentions. </span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">regards,</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
              </p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Victor K</p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
              </p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at
              2:00 PM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <<a
                href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">ocl@gih.com</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div> Dear Victor,<br>
                <br>
                congratulations to Maureen Hilyard on her appointment!<br>
                However, please see below:<br>
                <br>
                <div>On 08/04/2024 18:19, Victor Kuarsingh via
                  Chapter-delegates wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">In the
                      Chapters election, there were two (2) candidates
                      for one (1) seat. Having received the most votes,
                      Maureen Hilyard has been elected to a 3-year term
                      as a trustee.</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> </span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Voter
                      turn-out in the Chapters election was 83.19%. Of
                      the 113 eligible chapters, 94 voted. In accordance
                      with the<span> </span><a
href="https://www.internetsociety.org/about-internet-society/governance-policies/procedures-selecting-trustees/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Procedures
                        for Selecting Trustees</a>, Publication of the
                      Result, Maureen Hilyard received 44 votes.</span></p>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                Thank you for publishing the results, but I'm afraid
                they don't really make much sense.<br>
                <br>
                With 94 voting chapters and 44 votes going to Maureen
                Hilyard, that would mean 50 votes did not go to Maureen
                Hilyard, so does that mean that 7 votes or more were
                abstentions or invalid ballots?<br>
                <br>
                Usually vote results are given more clearly (and
                transparently) as:<br>
                <br>
                Candidate A: Nr. Votes - %<br>
                Candidate B: Nr. Votes - %<br>
                Abstentions: Nr. Votes - %<br>
                N/A: Nr. Votes - % (if possible)<br>
                <br>
                Kindest regards,<br>
                <br>
                Olivier<br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login">https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login</a>
View the Internet Society Code of Conduct: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/">https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>