<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">To this point made by Vint, John and Evan, <div class=""><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Jul 8, 2017, at 8:35 AM, vinton cerf <<a href="mailto:vgcerf@gmail.com" class="">vgcerf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</blockquote></div><div class=""><snip></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">The better solution would be an Internet Title expressing NN rules in an amended Telecom act but the present Congress seems an unlikely place in which to achieve passage of such legislation. </div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">I would encourage people to read Mark Buell's post about "What net neutrality is (and isn't)":<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/north-america-bureau/2017/05/what-net-neutrality-and-isnt" class="">https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/north-america-bureau/2017/05/what-net-neutrality-and-isnt</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Dan</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
--<br class="">Dan York<br class="">Senior Manager, Content & Web Strategy, Internet Society<br class=""><a href="mailto:york@isoc.org" class="">york@isoc.org</a>   +1-603-439-0024 <br class="">Jabber: <a href="mailto:york@jabber.isoc.org" class="">york@jabber.isoc.org</a>  Skype: danyork   <a href="http://twitter.com/danyork" class="">http://twitter.com/danyork</a><br class=""><br class=""><a href="http://www.internetsociety.org/" class="">http://www.internetsociety.org/</a><br class="">

</div>
<br class=""></div></div></div></body></html>