<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Greetings all:<br>
      <br>
      It is quite obvious that the end point for some in ICANN (not I
      think, Crocker) would be something as self-electing  and self
      referential as the International Olympic Committee.<br>
      Something we must avoid.<br>
      <br>
      Timothy Denton<br>
      Chairman, ISOC Canada chapter<br>
      <br>
      On 4/30/2015 4:27 AM, Richard Hill wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:012401d0831f$90dd6e40$b2984ac0$@ch"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New","serif";
        color:black;}
span.hoenzb
        {mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:Consolas;
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I
            agree that the jurisdiction issue is significant and cannot
            be swept under the rug.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Richard<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm
          0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
          <div>
            <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
              1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
                  Chapter-delegates
                  [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces@elists.isoc.org">mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces@elists.isoc.org</a>] <b>On
                    Behalf Of </b>Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> jeudi, 30. avril 2015 10:26<br>
                  <b>To:</b> Narelle Clark; Chapter Delegates<br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Chapter-delegates] Reminder -
                  Open comment period from ICANN CCWG for new naming
                  proposal<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Dear
            Narelle,<br>
            <br>
            this slide, number 18, is unsubstantiated. I would ignore
            it.<br>
            Ditto for slide 28, 29, 30...<br>
            <br>
            I would be more interested in Slide #19 - this is the issue
            of jurisdiction and the proposal so far keeps jurisdiction
            firmly in the United States.<br>
            <br>
            Kind regards,<br>
            <br>
            Olivier<o:p></o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">On 30/04/2015 09:55, Narelle Clark
              wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
                    All,<br>
                    you may find this further piece interesting also. I
                    admit to being deeply concerned and am seeking
                    further clarification.<br>
                    <br>
                    At the recent ARIN meeting a presentation was given:<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf">https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf</a><br>
                    <br>
                    Page 18 of the ARIN presentation says:<br>
                    <br>
                    "ICANN has verbally represented that they will
                    reject any proposed agreement<br>
                    in which ICANN is not deemed the sole source prime
                    contractor for IANA<br>
                    functions in perpetuity.<br>
                    <br>
                    "ICANN asserts that neither NTIA nor the US Congress
                    will approve any<br>
                    transition plan which leaves open the possibility of
                    a future non-US IANA<br>
                    Functions Operator."<br>
                    <br>
                    Milton Mueller has blogged on this:<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/</a>
                    <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/</a>><br>
                    <br>
                    An interesting quote from the article:<br>
                    <br>
                    "Those who claim that ICANN’s good performance of
                    the IANA functions in the past, under NTIA
                    supervision, means that we needn’t bother with
                    “complex” new organizational arrangements that
                    compensate for the loss of NTIA accountability are,
                    we think, being proved wrong. But it’s good that
                    this is happening now, before the die is fully cast.
                    Just imagine bargaining with ICANN once it has all
                    the marbles.”<br>
                    <br>
                    <o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Thoughts?<br>
                  <br>
                  <o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">Narelle<o:p></o:p></p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM,
                  Narelle Clark <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:narelle@isoc-au.org.au" target="_blank">narelle@isoc-au.org.au</a>>
                  wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal">All,<br>
                  we are entering what may be the final stages of the
                  compilation of the<br>
                  proposal for a post-US government stewardship of the
                  IANA functions.<br>
                  <br>
                  Like the numbering and protocol parameters groups
                  before them, the<br>
                  names community are in the final phases of compiling a
                  proposal for<br>
                  that final piece of IANA. Their proposal has gone out
                  for public<br>
                  comment, see:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en"
                    target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en</a><br>
                  <br>
                  I therefore encourage you to participate in this
                  community exercise.<br>
                  <br>
                  A huge thank you must go to everyone who participated
                  in the proposal<br>
                  development for the numbers community (via the CRISP
                  team from the<br>
                  RIRs) and the protocol parameters community (via
                  ianaplan from the<br>
                  IETF). Those proposals are comprehensive indeed:<br>
                  <br>
                  Numbers, ie RIR: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://www.nro.net/news/final-proposal-crisp"
                    target="_blank">https://www.nro.net/news/final-proposal-crisp</a><br>
                  Protocols, ie IETF:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09"
                    target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09</a><br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  We will be moving into the final phase soon, so I will
                  need people's<br>
                  thoughts on the overall system proposal: is it
                  appropriate?<br>
                  Have the processes been rigorous and dealt with issues
                  raised within<br>
                  standing community processes?<br>
                  Are the proposals consistent with each other?<br>
                  Will they work together?<br>
                  <br>
                  Is anything missing?<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Best regards<br>
                  <span style="color:#888888"><br>
                    <br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">Narelle</span><br>
                    <br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">--</span><br>
                    <br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">Narelle Clark</span><br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">ISOC nominee to the IANA
                      Coordination Group</span><br>
                    <br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">Immediate Past President and
                      Board Member</span><br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">Internet Society of Australia</span><br>
                    <span class="hoenzb"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:narelle@internet.org.au">narelle@internet.org.au</a></span><br>
                    <span class="hoenzb"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.internet.org.au"
                        target="_blank">www.internet.org.au</a></span><br>
                    <span class="hoenzb">The Internet is for Everyone!</span></span><o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                <br clear="all">
                <br>
                -- <o:p></o:p></p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    Narelle Clark<br>
                    Immediate Past President and Board Member<br>
                    Internet Society of Australia<br>
                    ph: 0412 297 043<br>
                    int ph: +61 412 297 043<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:president@isoc-au.org.au"
                      target="_blank">narelle@isoc-au.org.au</a><br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.isoc-au.org.au" target="_blank">www.isoc-au.org.au</a><br>
                    The Internet is for Everyone!<o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <o:p></o:p></p>
            <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
            <pre>As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed<o:p></o:p></pre>
            <pre>to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society<o:p></o:p></pre>
            <pre>Chapter Portal (AMS): <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://portal.isoc.org">https://portal.isoc.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
          </blockquote>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
            <br>
            <o:p></o:p></p>
          <pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
Chapter Portal (AMS): <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://portal.isoc.org">https://portal.isoc.org</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Timothy Denton
      613 789 5397
      613 222 1850 mobile</div>
  </body>
</html>