<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Dear Narelle,<br>
    <br>
    this slide, number 18, is unsubstantiated. I would ignore it.<br>
    Ditto for slide 28, 29, 30...<br>
    <br>
    I would be more interested in Slide #19 - this is the issue of
    jurisdiction and the proposal so far keeps jurisdiction firmly in
    the United States.<br>
    <br>
    Kind regards,<br>
    <br>
    Olivier<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30/04/2015 09:55, Narelle Clark
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CACRMD1EqrPQpCjZDt0ZZZC_pdSyVa+6yR1757ykyHUnH=L+g+A@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div><br>
            All,<br>
            you may find this further piece interesting also. I admit to
            being deeply concerned and am seeking further clarification.<br>
            <br>
            At the recent ARIN meeting a presentation was given:<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf">https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/monday/crisp_panel.pdf</a><br>
            <br>
            Page 18 of the ARIN presentation says:<br>
            <br>
            "ICANN has verbally represented that they will reject any
            proposed agreement<br>
            in which ICANN is not deemed the sole source prime
            contractor for IANA<br>
            functions in perpetuity.<br>
            <br>
            "ICANN asserts that neither NTIA nor the US Congress will
            approve any<br>
            transition plan which leaves open the possibility of a
            future non-US IANA<br>
            Functions Operator."<br>
            <br>
            Milton Mueller has blogged on this:<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/</a>
            <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/">http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-functions-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/</a>><br>
            <br>
            An interesting quote from the article:<br>
            <br>
            "Those who claim that ICANN’s good performance of the IANA
            functions in the past, under NTIA supervision, means that we
            needn’t bother with “complex” new organizational
            arrangements that compensate for the loss of NTIA
            accountability are, we think, being proved wrong. But it’s
            good that this is happening now, before the die is fully
            cast. Just imagine bargaining with ICANN once it has all the
            marbles.”<br>
            <br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Thoughts?<br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </div>
        Narelle<br>
        <div>
          <div><br>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM,
          Narelle Clark <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:narelle@isoc-au.org.au" target="_blank">narelle@isoc-au.org.au</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">All,<br>
            we are entering what may be the final stages of the
            compilation of the<br>
            proposal for a post-US government stewardship of the IANA
            functions.<br>
            <br>
            Like the numbering and protocol parameters groups before
            them, the<br>
            names community are in the final phases of compiling a
            proposal for<br>
            that final piece of IANA. Their proposal has gone out for
            public<br>
            comment, see:<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en"
              target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en</a><br>
            <br>
            I therefore encourage you to participate in this community
            exercise.<br>
            <br>
            A huge thank you must go to everyone who participated in the
            proposal<br>
            development for the numbers community (via the CRISP team
            from the<br>
            RIRs) and the protocol parameters community (via ianaplan
            from the<br>
            IETF). Those proposals are comprehensive indeed:<br>
            <br>
            Numbers, ie RIR: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://www.nro.net/news/final-proposal-crisp"
              target="_blank">https://www.nro.net/news/final-proposal-crisp</a><br>
            Protocols, ie IETF:<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09"
              target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09</a><br>
            <br>
            <br>
            We will be moving into the final phase soon, so I will need
            people's<br>
            thoughts on the overall system proposal: is it appropriate?<br>
            Have the processes been rigorous and dealt with issues
            raised within<br>
            standing community processes?<br>
            Are the proposals consistent with each other?<br>
            Will they work together?<br>
            <br>
            Is anything missing?<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Best regards<br>
            <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                <br>
                Narelle<br>
                <br>
                --<br>
                <br>
                Narelle Clark<br>
                ISOC nominee to the IANA Coordination Group<br>
                <br>
                Immediate Past President and Board Member<br>
                Internet Society of Australia<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:narelle@internet.org.au">narelle@internet.org.au</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.internet.org.au" target="_blank">www.internet.org.au</a><br>
                The Internet is for Everyone!<br>
              </font></span></blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <br>
        -- <br>
        <div class="gmail_signature">
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Narelle Clark<br>
            Immediate Past President and Board Member<br>
            Internet Society of Australia<br>
            ph: 0412 297 043<br>
            int ph: +61 412 297 043<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:president@isoc-au.org.au" target="_blank">narelle@isoc-au.org.au</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.isoc-au.org.au"
              target="_blank">www.isoc-au.org.au</a><br>
            The Internet is for Everyone!<br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
Chapter Portal (AMS): <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://portal.isoc.org">https://portal.isoc.org</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a>
</pre>
  </body>
</html>