<div dir="ltr">Eric,<div><br></div><div>agree with the "be careful with what you wish because it may happen" perspective here and with the negative assessment of the Letter of Marque (for the Spanish speakers: "patente de corso") (the licence under which corsaires, a type of pirates, were allowed to operate by the kings and queens.) </div>
<div><br></div><div>So, up what MS tree do we bark to a. revert this screw-up by MS, and how can we, as ISOC, constrain others from making the same mistake? We need this at the "global" level (funny enough, the trans-jurisdictional reach of a US corporation in this case) and for each of our countries. Should ISOC work on publishing a handbook for takedowns like the controversial (very useful) reference on the least bad way to do them published and regularly updated by ICANN?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Yours,</div><div><br></div><div>Alejandro Pisanty</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Eric Burger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eburger@standardstrack.com" target="_blank">eburger@standardstrack.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Tread carefully here. Would we rather have Interpol, the FBI, or GCHQ “protect” us from the C&C networks that were hiding behind No-IP? Such a statement could be interpreted that rather than having people and corporations trying to police ourselves, one would rather have governments provide police “protection” on the Internet.<br>
<br>
I am NOT trying to justify Microsoft’s actions - they clearly screwed up. The USG also screwed up by giving Microsoft a the equivalent of a Letter of Marque to attack No-IP. That is NOT a positive precedent. However, we must be VERY careful how we comment on this. From many governments’ perspectives, this played out *as* a MS-model move (pardon the pun).<br>
<br>
On Jul 1, 2014, at 2:55 AM, Elver Loho <<a href="mailto:elver.loho@gmail.com">elver.loho@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Does ISOC HQ intend to release a statement on Microsoft's<br>
> anti-multistakeholder-model actions?<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/06/millions-of-dymanic-dns-users-suffer-after-microsoft-seizes-no-ip-domains/" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/06/millions-of-dymanic-dns-users-suffer-after-microsoft-seizes-no-ip-domains/</a><br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Elver<br>
> .ee<br>
><br>
> <a href="mailto:elver.loho@gmail.com">elver.loho@gmail.com</a><br>
> <a href="tel:%2B372%205661%206933" value="+37256616933">+372 5661 6933</a><br>
> skype: elver.loho<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed<br>
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society<br>
> Chapter Portal (AMS): <a href="https://portal.isoc.org" target="_blank">https://portal.isoc.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed<br>
to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society<br>
Chapter Portal (AMS): <a href="https://portal.isoc.org" target="_blank">https://portal.isoc.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br>
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>Facultad de Química UNAM<br>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD<br>+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475<br>Blog: <a href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>
LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/apisanty" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, <a href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
</div>