<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Dear Friends and Colleagues:</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">With a view to the webinar scheduled
on Thursday afternoon, I would have a few comments and suggestions
on the draft paper that Konstantinos Komaitis has sent us. </p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">In general
it would be appropriate to make more clear the distinctions between
over-arching values and principles such as the rule of law and the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and procedures and methods
such as multistakeholder governance and open standards.</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">In the recent past we used to discuss
the 'virtual' world, the Internet, as something distinct from the
'real' traditional world and to treat the rules in each sphere as
somehow different, and Internet 'users' were a distinct group from
the rest of society. But nowadays, that distinction is no longer
useful because the Internet increasingly pervades everything that
society and individuals do.</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Thus, the draft ISOC paper needs to
start from the general values and principles and then discuss the
methodology of IPR discussions – and decisions – recognising that
whatever may apply to the Internet will in due course apply
generally, if it is not already the case. Indeed we get a hint of the
problem in the title of the paper. (Internet) is in brackets! But the
paper still discusses IPR in the Internet as if it is still a
distinct 'space'. What happens to the argument if '(Internet)' is
deleted?</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">If we could clarify this dichotomy, it
would no doubt be less difficult to resolve some of the other issues
which arise in the draft paper and which are discussed in greater detail in the attached working paper.</p><div>
<p align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">I look
forward to our discussion on Thursday afternoon. There are a few
other minor points that I could take up at some stage, but I would
prefer to do so on the basis of the next draft, which might take into
consideration the above considerations. Needless to say, I would
suggest that publication of the present draft would be premature.</p><p align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Regards</p><p align="LEFT" style="margin-bottom: 0in; ">Christopher
Wilkinson.</p><div><br></div></div><div></div></body></html>